观点荟萃丨彭博社报道我院李实教授关于共同富裕的解读
编者按
彭博社于2021年9月5日报道了浙江大学共享与发展研究院院长李实教授关于共同富裕的解读。该报道主要阐述了有关中国收入不平等、基尼系数、浙江共同富裕示范区、中国税收改革、房产税、城乡差距、私营经济和共同富裕政策对高收入人群的影响等八个问题。本文整理自彭博社题为“China's 'Mr Income Distribution' Explains Common Prosperity”的文章。
(BLOOMBERG) – China’s push for “common prosperity” is not just about taxing the rich but also directing resources into rural areas and the lower-income group, according to one of the country’s most prominent experts studying income inequality.
The income gap has widened in the country over the past five years due to the rise of technology and financial sectors, and taxation has done little in narrowing the gap, said Li Shi, an economics professor at Zhejiang University, who has previously advised the government on poverty alleviation. He’s known in international academic circles as “Mr Chinese income distribution” because of his work, according to the university’s website.
As China’s top leaders ramp up a campaign to address inequality, the government needs to increase taxes on individuals, including rolling out a property tax and inheritance tax, and boost spending on public services in villages, according to Li.
Here are highlights from a recent interview with Li, which has been lightly edited for clarity.
How bad is China’s income inequality?
China’s income gap has expanded since the 1980s to reach a peak in 2008, when the Gini coefficient reached around 0.5. After that, it declined for a few years slowly, but has rebounded since 2015. Now it’s at a high level of around 0.47, according to an official estimate.The actual income gap could be larger, because the estimate is based on household surveys, which tend to under-represent high-income respondents.
China is among the 20 per cent most unequal countries in the world. Inequality is quite serious. The inequality within cities and within rural areas has also been expanding. Now urban residents roughly earn 2.5 times that of rural residents.
The main problem is unbalanced development, with the household registration system restricting people’s movement and leading to all kinds of discrimination for migrant workers.
In addition, China’s overall development strategy has focused on cities and neglected villages. A city-oriented strategy has led to public services concentrated in urban areas, hurt the economy in rural areas and the income growth of residents there.
What’s caused the rebound in China’s Gini coefficient in recent years?
Many new industries have emerged, especially the digital economy has expanded rapidly in recent years. Digital platforms, coupled with AI technology, have attracted highly-educated workers who enjoy high wages that also grow fast.
In addition, China’s expanding financial industry has a strong monopolistic characteristic, which led to exceptionally high salary. Wages in other industries expanded slowly at the same time.
The rapid rise of income from assets also contributed to inequality, because high earners usually have more assets than low-income groups. Even though the government has dialed up taxation and transfer payments, it has failed to reverse the trend of a widening income gap.
As China’s economy slowed, low-income groups suffered more from slower income growth, contributing to the wider gap.
How do you evaluate Zhejiang province’s plan to achieve common prosperity?
Zhejiang’s plan has two priorities: achieving high-quality growth and sharing wealth. The policies are mainly on narrowing the income gap, equalising access to basic public services and narrowing the urban-rural gap.
The next step is to formulate specific implementation rules so they can make a real impact. For example, questions like whether it should launch a property tax or inheritance tax, and whether it should reform the personal income tax – all of these details will need to be confirmed, which will take some time.
On one hand, we need to lift the income of rural residents and people in poorer areas. On the other hand, we need to enhance the quality of public services, including education and medical services.
The goal is also about narrowing people’s development gap, giving children and teenagers more education opportunities to create higher-quality human capital.
How should China reform its tax system?
China’s taxation has played a very limited role in redistributing income. There are two types of taxes: direct tax and indirect tax.
Direct tax helps narrow income inequality, while indirect tax widens it. In China, the proportion of direct taxes is low, accounting for a third of the fiscal revenue, while indirect tax makes up two thirds. The ratio is usually reversed in developed countries. If we don’t enhance the tax structure, it would be difficult for taxation to adjust income distribution.
China needs to increase direct taxes, including income tax, wealth tax, property tax and inheritance tax – all the taxes directly imposed on residents. It can increase the share of direct tax under the condition of maintaining the overall tax burden.
When will China roll out the property tax to more places?
Despite many discussions on launching a property tax, it still hasn’t entered the legislation process. It’s hard to tell how long this will take.
Policy makers also have other considerations: a property tax could be a shock to the economy and create a negative impact. The economy is currently in a sluggish state and is still recovering from the impact of the pandemic. A property tax could be a blow to the property sector and weigh on housing prices. It’s a question whether the economy can withstand it. So such policies are best to be launched when the economy is booming.
What kind of social reforms are needed to address the urban-rural gap?
There’s a huge difference between public services in rural areas and cities, such as the quality of schools and teachers. We need to invest more resources in rural areas and poorer regions through public spending.
The government also needs to use more of its expenditure on improving people’s livelihood. We need to make greater use of taxes to adjust high earners’ income and use transfer payment to improve low-income groups’ earnings.
What role should private businesses play in promoting common prosperity?
The private economy should play an important, positive role. That’s the experience from Zhejiang, which has lower inequality with better growth. The private economy, especially small businesses, played a critical role in that. Zhejiang’s private businesses are dynamic and provided lots of jobs, attracting workers from other provinces. Without the private economy, common prosperity is just an empty slogan.
How will life of the rich be affected?
Rich people’s lives won’t change much. Top leaders have repeatedly said that common prosperity is not egalitarianism or robbing the rich to feed the poor. Rich people may have to make more contribution in terms of taxes and charitable donations. But paying 5 per cent or 10 per cent more taxes won’t bring a huge impact to their lives.
彭博社的报道被海外多家媒体转载：
来源：雅虎
来源：新加坡新闻
来源：亚洲每日新闻
李实
浙江大学文科资深教授、浙江大学公共管理学院教授、浙江大学共享与发展研究院院长。主要研究领域为收入分配、公共政策、贫困、劳动力市场等。先后主持国家级和省部级项目20余项，其中国家社会科学基金重大项目、国家自然科学基金重点项目、教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目、联合国开发计划署（UNDP）研究项目等10余项，出版著作20余部，在《中国社会科学》、《经济研究》、《管理世界》以及《Journal of Development Economics》等国内外学术刊物发表学术论文200余篇。曾三次获得孙冶方经济学奖（1994年、2010年、2017年）、联合国人类发展奖（2007年）、张培刚发展经济学奖（2010年）、全国扶贫开发先进个人（2011年）、杜润生中国农村发展研究奖（2015年）、第八届中国经济理论创新奖（2017年）、全国脱贫攻坚奖创新奖（2018年）等。目前兼任中国劳动学会副会长、中国薪酬研究会副会长、德国劳动研究所（IZA）研究员、中国经济体制改革研究会学术委员会委员、中国发展研究基金会学术委员会委员、国家发展和改革委员会“十四五”国家发展规划专家委员会委员等职。曾任国家人力资源和社会保障部专家咨询委员会委员、国务院扶贫领导小组专家咨询委员会委员、农业农村部专家咨询委员会委员等职。
观点荟萃丨我院李实教授、何文炯教授接受人民网采访，谈中国的共同富裕
来源：彭博社
编辑：徐明聪
扫码关注我们
浙大共享与发展研究院
联系邮箱：zjuicpd@zju.edu.cn